“Hypersexualized” countries with loose sexual morality have high birth rates. Same for those populations within civilized countries that are known to be sexually loose. First world populations in USA, Yurop and EastAsia must therefore have low birth rates for other reasons.

Bizarre responses here from people who know nothing about world. The Third World isn't chaste or sexually not loose just because they are against Western gender ideology: and as I've said Western gender ideology isn't itself a consequence of lustfulness or "hypersexualization"

It seems a lot of "dissident" sphere both right and Marxoid takes Dugin & co at their words regarding non-Western customs. So here is short thred about Third World """conservative""" mores and habits.

Let's start with most controversial case, the Muslim and Arab world. Leaving aside case of al ammah or "concubines"; not every woman is chaste, concubines exist and are supposed to walk unclothed with bare breasts. It is not a sin to touch their breasts, is like touching wall

But many write of Muslim world in ignorance of fact Englishmen and other Euros traveled to eg Morocco and elsewhere for boy sex. That's because they couldn't easily find it in England but such practices are widespread and easy in Arab world and Middle East more generally

It's a commonplace for anyone who's traveled in the area or even just knows men from the Gulf; Lawrence of Arabia was raped by Turk soldiers, some of Napoleon's men were raped in Egypt when captured but it's not just a wartime prison domination thing; any blond man who's walked through a Middle Eastern open air market can tell you the vibes and advances they got from the men. Furthermore friends who've spent long time in Thailand at nice hotels will report getting eye-fucked or made advances on by tourist Arabs, not only the bearded men, but also their "chaste" wives in burqas.

From Iranian Heey:

I think you are a bunch of idiots trying to judge everything with your nonsensical mindset.

I am a man and have fucked boys in Iran when I was at high school. They were supposedly gay and we used to call them sissy boys. So, will that make me gay? No! I did that because girls were not accessible. Also at a younger age 'fucking somebody' meant `proving your superiority'. Even now, I would happily fuck you mf* to show who has the upper hand!

But this sort of affairs would mostly happen between bullies and sissies. The rest 90% of children were immune of such activities. Those of us who did such things a couple of times also gave up doing so as we became more mature. I think you are out of your mind if you think 30% of men are gay or those unmarried are involved with other men!! You come up with such ideas only because your fucked-up society is so obsessed with gays, gayness, gay rights, etc.

As Ahmadinejad said, "we don't have gays in Iran"! But we are happy to export our sissy boys to your fucked-up societies, as I am sure you will enjoy their company, since you new- generation nerdish westerners have turned gays yourselves.

When moral places like Iran say they don't have gheys or homosexuality this is what they mean. This is already known and for long time, but the converse of this is also obvious, i.e., the destination wouldn't just be favorable to tourist pathics but also those seeking pathics. The same is and has always been true for the whole Arab world which is why medieval Arabic poetry features almost only boys, why it's always been attractive to Englishmen of Greek interests, and why Richard Burton wrote RE the Sotadic Zone

Maybe the craziest answer I got in my thread was about Afreaka; some people remarked sarcastically that Afreaka, which has a high birth rate, is known as a place where "anything goes." The meaning being that of course Afreaka is a chaste place because they supposedly dislike "gheys."

I found this unbelievable and a prime example of X "imbecile telephone game" where people trade "tidbits" that have become conventional wisdom here, which ends up being the opposite of reality. Presumably they are referring to public or govt. condemnation of homosexuality in certain Afreakan nations or the "conservative" bishops there, or Dugin's simplistic opposition between Western "liberal" lasciviousness versus noble Third World salt-of-the-earth chaste-and-moral working folk.

This is absurd. Of course anything goes in Afreaka. Public condemnation aside, homosex is widespread and easy. Gaetan Dugas chose to go to Guinea-Bissau or similar to get railed in gangbangs precisely because Afreaka has always been a place easy to do this for example.

The HIV rate in Afreaka is through the roof and not only because of homosex but because of extremely loose behavior of the femaels as well, including married femaels. In Congo there are places where local custom is "you are guest, welcome, I am hospitable fuck my wife."

In general I've known quite a few spergs whose tastes ran that way who fucked a wide swathe through Afreaka because the grils are so easy. One guest I might have one day on show, if he can avoid getting brain-medicated, is "the most popular playboy in Nairobi." Others I've known have fucked dozens of femaels easily and without fuss on regular trips or safaris, and no not for money, including twins simultaneously and such.

In the USA, not sure if this is cultural transmission or biological inheritance, but many gheys can tell you how easy sex is with a bantooid man if you want it. Almost any "straight" congoid man will engage in homosex for a trivial amount of $, and not just in the active role; they will do anything. This is why Tareek Nasheed's obsession with "buckbreaking," which seems ridiculous for outsiders to admit to, but it's because it's a huge thing in that communitay and they all buckbreak each other, whether in jail, or otherwise in daily life. White gheys tend not to favor this demographic for sex0rz, however, while they do like Latinos etc., which is part of the reason the ghey communitay supports mass migration, as a ready source of their favored partners. If they did like bantooid men more as a whole, there would be less support for mass migration among that influential group; I've talked about this on my show.

I will not comment on the habits of congooid femaels in the diaspora either in USA where their communitay has been run-through by obesity, or in Latin America etc. where they are thin; their habits are well-known and how easy they are. But it's unbelievable to me people on here could come to think Afreaka is any different because Dugin said so, or some Sinophile or Marxoid lecturing about Western "decadence."

Precisely ZERO of Western concern with "gender" or formerly with ghey rights has anything to do with lust, lustfulness, or "hypersexualization"; that's not where BeyondWomyn comes from. Nor does the low birth rate in developed world come from lustfulness, nor would this problem be solved by teachings of chastity, or by religious instruction or religious government. In fact it might even make it worse.