Jonah Hill demands worse than "male insecurity." What he did is only normal in a peasant society. It's not just that Hill himself comes out of a peasant social milieu, but that society in general is coarsened to petty moralisms of Anatolian village 2 hr drive outside Ankara.
There's nothing "trad" about Hill's demands unless your definition of trad is a calculating shopkeeper's life. Imagine Catherine Deneuve's lovers complaining about her nudity in movies in 1960's; would have been recognized as absurd and buffonishly peasant.
None of the original frogs--NONE--come out of this schoolmarm moralism frame, and precisely zero of the international attention we have brought to the right has anything to do with a chandala mystery meat "finding religion" and engaging in Pharisaic moral braggartry on camera
It was humor and freewheeling amoralism and actually very dirty and naughty things that made the right preeminent before these closetcase Pharisees moved in around 2016-7 while we all got banned. The culture of 4chan and forums had ZERO to do with this peasant moralism, ZERO
Whatever you may think of Hitl0r, the vicissitudes of his career, or his crimes or successes or failures--it's irrelevant in what I will now say to understand a substantive difference between the progressive and the traditional right. Short thred:
Hitl0r was attacked by Junker and other conservatives as a "degenerate"; they tried to smear him by association not only with Ernst Rohm but with similar others (including libertines, schizos in mental asylums etc.); Hitl0r's answer: the SA is not an organization for little girls
You can bring up instances like the attack on Hirschfeld's clinic all you want; they are one or two instances, and that is a tiny part of why radical right arose. I and frends would have done the same in that case, but trads would still dislike me and disagree, and vice versa
Nazi family, sexual and breeding policy would be completely unacceptable in general to conservatives and religious traditionalists today, thirty years ago, or even at the time, and I'm not only talking about Lebensborn or such. It was simply not a conservative movement
The "trad" attacks on Hitl0r, Mussolini were repeated in attenuated analogy--maybe comic analogy--with Trump. Cruz et al attacked him as a degenerate NYC urbanite playboy.
Many trads are cuckservatives, femael-led and always do these things to obscure their weakness
Don't let Femael Question or desire for personal advice blind you to danger of being swallowed into ineffectual Moral Majority; or latest variation: 3rd World "conservative" submorons daily two-minute rage at latest onlyfan eprostie or "degeneracy"
We aren't defending any existing social or moral order, as none exists. We are fighting already in the kingdom of darkness to win the youth to an exhilarating vision of the future. Moral Pharisaism, hysteria, braggartry can't do that and opens the door to embarrassing imbeciles.
PS It should go without saying that the Animejugend are excepted from this discussion entirely; they are too funny to be moralistic...they proceed from a good place, a state of strong nihilism. Their perception of the roastie menace is correct.